We’ve known for a while now that Tesla has been using a custom build of FSD to allow its newly produced vehicles at Giga Texas and Fremont to autonomously navigate themselves from the production line to the outbound delivery lot.
While we knew they were using a custom build of what was likely FSD Unsupervised, thanks to a recent post from Tesla AI on X, this has now been confirmed. Tesla has also confirmed it has accrued over 50,000 driverless miles, totalled from vehicles autonomously driving themselves to delivery lots.
Giga Texas production now uses FSD Unsupervised to deliver cars from end of line to the outbound logistics lot.
Over 50,000 driverless miles have been accrued between California and Texas factories so far pic.twitter.com/79zKY0U6Ox
For most of Tesla’s vehicles - that’s a 1.4-mile trip that is shared with pedestrians, cars, trucks, and construction equipment. You can see in the video that the Teslas are navigating public roadways and encountering real human drivers.
That’s great news, especially since many were wondering whether Tesla would secure the necessary approvals in time to launch their Robotaxi network in June.
Increased Confidence
Following Tesla’s post to X, Musk followed up by saying that when Tesla launches FSD Unsupervised soon, it will be the first time there will be a generalized, pure AI solution to autonomy. Tesla and several executives continue to post more content about autonomy and the Robotaxi network, leading us to believe they’re feeling confident in the June launch.
Model Ys autonomously navigate a 1.4 mile trip on a road shared with pedestrians, cars, semi trucks, construction equipment & more pic.twitter.com/iPx2fs78v2
Back when Tesla initially announced the autonomous travel of its vehicles from production to loading lots, they mentioned that the Cybertruck was the only vehicle at Giga Texas not receiving that same treatment.
Now, that’s changed - Cybertruck is now also navigating through the Cybertunnel to make its way from the factory directly to the loading docks, all on Unsupervised FSD. And that’s making us even more excited, especially because Tesla was supposed to launch an FSD Update for the Cybertruck a little while ago - but it hasn’t made it to production yet. This update is set to bring Start FSD from Park, as well as Actually Smart Summon - bringing the Cybertruck to feature parity with Tesla’s other AI4 vehicles.
Cybertrucks autonomously navigate a 0.6 mile route traversing beneath one of America's fastest highways, emerging through a steep 17% grade to reach their destination pic.twitter.com/3ZMYCRPhIj
Now that Tesla is confidently using a build of Unsupervised FSD to navigate the tight confines of the tunnel and park, we’re pretty sure that Tesla will likely launch the expected FSD update in the near future.
FSD Update Soon?
It’s been a while since any FSD hardware variant has received an FSD update. It appears that Tesla has been focused on Unsupervised FSD and launching FSD outside of North America.
It seems like we may get a new FSD update soon, and we don’t believe it’ll be just for the Cybertruck. Those who have the opportunity to sign up for Tesla’s new Early Access program will likely be some of the first recipients to receive the FSD update, so stay tuned.
Subscribe
Subscribe to our newsletter to stay up to date on the latest Tesla news, upcoming features and software updates.
Lars Moravvy, Tesla's Vice President of Vehicle Engineering, recently took to X to pose a question to the community: “Let's make Teslas better… what do you all want for 2026?”
The question absolutely took off, and there were tons of fantastic suggestions about what Tesla owners would love to see from their vehicles in the future.
There were more than 12k suggestions, so let's take a look at some of the most popular feature requests.
Top Suggestions
CyberSUV - A classically styled SUV with a stainless steel exterior.
Faster Charging & Better Charge Curves - Tesla vehicles start off with fast charging speeds, but usually taper off quickly in comparison to other brands. This is especially true when compared to some Chinese brands, which sustain 500 kW charging at up to 70% state of charge. Let's get improved charging speeds on Teslas as well, especially with the 500 kW Superchargers coming in Q3.
450mi / 500mi range vehicles - Lots of customers want longer range vehicles, even though Tesla's analysis says the 300-mile range is ideal for 90% of its customer base. Range really does matter - especially for customers in more rural locations or those who choose to tow or haul with their vehicles.
Ambient Lighting Reacts to Music - This one is pretty straightforward, and it's surprising we don't already have this feature. Having basic integration with the currently playing audio is a neat feature, and really helps to make the entire experience even more seamless and premium.
Refresh Model 3 Signal Stalk Retrofit - Some people really love their signal stalks. While there aren't retrofits available just yet, we do recommend the Enhauto Stalks. For those who want an official retrofit, there is now some hope - Lars responded and said he'll try.
Lumbar Support in the Profile - Right now, lumbar support is the only seat item not saved to the Tesla Profile. This may change soon, as Lars followed up and mentioned that there are a few technical issues preventing it, but Tesla could make it work with some of their magic.
Model 3 Track Pack - The Model S has an exclusive Track Pack as a post-factory retrofit offered by Tesla, including premium brakes, tires, and wheels. The Refreshed Model 3 Performance is a killer track vehicle - but getting real track support from Tesla would be a game-changer for those who love to race.
Some of Our Favorites
Sentry Mode Improvements - Several users suggested adding B-pillar recording to Sentry Mode. And it looks like Tesla has already been working on this, and it'll be available in the upcoming 2025 Spring Update, which will be update 2025.14. Unfortunately, it'll be limited to what appears to be HW4 vehicles due to the additional processing.
Massaging Seats - A touch of luxury for Tesla's most premium models would be nice. Many other luxury brands already offer massaging seats so it’d help keep the Model S on par with these brands. Edit: Corrected that the Model S has never come with massaging seats.
Powershare for More Vehicles - Powershare is a fantastic feature, and bringing it to every Tesla is a must, especially as many other brands, including Ford, Kia, and Hyundai, offer either Vehicle to Load or Vehicle to Home capabilities as an option on their EVs. Tesla recently introduced the Mobile Connector with Powershare capabilities and an Outlet Adapter, but it's still exclusive to the Cybertruck for now.
Starlink Integration - Tesla currently uses cell networks for connectivity, which can sometimes be spotty. Starlink is a clear, high-tech solution that could provide data to vehicles when they have a clear line of sight to the sky.
Grok in Vehicles - Musk has already confirmed that Tesla will be integrating Grok into Tesla vehicles. We expected it to be included in Tesla's Spring Update, but it looks like they'll need a little bit longer. One of the lead xAI/Grok developers mentioned the request with a wink emoji, so it's clear it’s a feature that Tesla and xAI are actively working on. The way users will be able to naturally talk to AI will be game-changing for many users who are used to driving alone.
There was a lot of positivity in the comments, as well as a ton of interesting requests that could eventually be implemented in Tesla vehicles. Lars also responded to quite a few of the comments, which was nice to see.
While nothing is certain, some of these popular requests may come in a future update, while others may need hardware changes if Tesla wants to implement them.
2026 may seem far away, but there's already plenty of coming this year with a cheaper vehicle and the launch of the Robotaxi network.
If you love reading about feature suggestions, we also recently covered the top feature requests for Tesla, based on the many requests we hear about.
Back in October 2020, Tesla made waves by dissolving its public relations team—an unprecedented move in the automotive industry. Until then, Tesla’s PR department handled media inquiries and influencer outreach directly, building one-on-one relationships with journalists.
That kind of engagement helped shape the narrative, even as Tesla faced a steady stream of negative press. Remember all the “Tesla Killer” headlines? Or the negative stories about Autopilot, EV fires, and other exaggerated claims?
Nearly five years have passed since Tesla PR went the way of the dodo. But is it time to bring them back?
I believe it may be—both as a Tesla-focused journalist and as a longtime follower and customer. As a communications professional, I also bring an understanding of how organizations should communicate with their key stakeholders. For Tesla, that means customers, investors, and partners.
Social Media Isn’t Enough
Tesla primarily communicates through X, often via the personal accounts of its executives. While the company is quick to respond to viral news articles or social media posts it deems inaccurate, this reactive strategy isn’t very effective. It allows misleading information to linger in the public sphere for days, weeks, or even months without correction. To this day, many people still believe Tesla vehicles spontaneously catch fire—a myth that persists largely because Tesla hasn’t made a concerted effort to refute it through official channels.
Relying on social media to combat incorrect information lacks the weight and permanence of a formal press release or official statement. Making matters worse, the overwhelming volume of posts—especially Elon Musk’s 700+ tweets per week—buries key responses, making it unlikely that even the most dedicated followers will see them, let alone the general public.
Expecting Tesla’s leadership, including Elon, to constantly monitor and correct media narratives is not only unrealistic, but also a poor use of executive time. Their focus should be on steering the company, not playing an endless game of digital whack-a-mole. This kind of reactive communication is exactly why a dedicated public relations team is essential—something nearly every major company already understands.
Without a formal PR department, Tesla lacks the infrastructure to request corrections or retractions through proper journalistic channels. Take a recent example: a Tesla executive publicly disputed a false headline, yet the article remains live—with nothing more than a small note saying “Tesla has refuted this.” A tweet may challenge a story, but it doesn’t carry the authority or procedural heft of an official PR statement. As a result, the incorrect information stays alive and continues to shape public perception.
To make matters worse, the majority of people who engage with Tesla’s social media accounts—or with Elon directly—are already supporters or owners. This creates an echo chamber, where rebuttals and clarifications reach only those who already believe in the company, while the broader public and traditional media remain largely untouched.
Communicate with Customers
Tesla’s reliance on social media for communication feels aligned with its future-focused image—but that reliance is also one of its biggest shortcomings. Sharing key updates about product development, software rollouts, or policy changes almost exclusively through X means that crucial information often fails to reach the wider customer base.
Case in point: I recently came across a post in a large Tesla Facebook group where a user was confused about major changes to Full Self-Driving. They hadn’t used it in months, didn’t know V13 had been released, and were completely unfamiliar with the new settings. Their last experience was with V11, and all they wanted was to use FSD for an upcoming road trip.
Information like this—about feature updates, major changes, or even safety-related notices—should be distributed through more direct and dependable channels. For example, do you know how to check if your Tesla has an active recall? Most people don’t. It’s not available in the app or on the vehicle interface; you have to visit a specific page on Tesla’s website. That’s a clear communications gap.
A dedicated PR team could help fix this, establishing a more coordinated and accessible flow of information that doesn’t rely solely on social media. It would also improve the customer experience by making key updates easier to find and understand.
Then there’s the issue of customer feedback. While Tesla executives do receive input via X, that’s not a scalable or representative feedback loop. It leans on the same echo chamber that’s often hesitant to criticize publicly.
Despite Tesla collecting enormous amounts of vehicle telemetry and even voice feedback from FSD users, there’s no clear, public-facing way for customers to offer feedback directly. A good example: the backlash over the deactivation of the 12V sockets in the rear of the Model Y and Model X. It prevented many owners from powering sub-trunk fridges on road trips. Tesla will eventually re-enable the feature via a software update, but never acknowledged the issue, the complaints, or the fix.
Influencers
Tesla’s relationship with the influencer community is also beginning to shift. Historically, the company offered early access to Full Self-Driving features to select influencers, giving them the opportunity to showcase new capabilities before the broader public. But that approach seems to be evolving—early access now appears to be part of a larger, more public rollout strategy. As a result, Tesla-focused content creators, who have delivered significant value to the community, are no longer receiving the same level of support.
This shift is especially evident in the current referral program, which is now capped at 10 referrals. Many of the top influencers across X, YouTube, TikTok, and other platforms maxed out back in January. Under the new rules, they’re also unable to share someone else’s referral code—limiting the reach and impact of their promotion.
While Tesla still occasionally invites major YouTubers to help promote flagship vehicle launches or participate in high-profile interviews, these moments are few and far between. There’s a noticeable absence of a consistent, structured engagement strategy with content creators—a missed opportunity, especially for a company that famously doesn’t spend on traditional advertising.
Public-Facing View
In recent months, Tesla’s brand reputation has come under additional pressure. Much of this stems from the increasingly blurred lines between the company and Elon Musk’s high-profile, and often controversial, political and social commentary—including his public involvement with the current U.S. administration.
Without a dedicated corporate communications team, Tesla lacks a clear, authoritative voice to distinguish the company’s mission, values, and actions from Elon’s personal views. A skilled PR team could play a critical role in defining that line—crafting strategic messaging, issuing official statements that reflect corporate values, and managing the brand independently, while still allowing Elon to remain the public face of the company.
This gap becomes especially evident in moments of public criticism or protest. Tesla’s typical response—a reactive post on X—often falls short in both tone and reach, particularly when addressing complex or sensitive issues. A formal PR function would give Tesla the tools to engage more thoughtfully, issue timely and appropriate responses, and better protect a brand image that increasingly feels unstable.
Concluding Note
Almost five years have passed since Tesla dissolved its dedicated PR team and instead relied on the direct and often unfiltered communication from its executive suite through X. While it is undeniably disruptive and fitting to Tesla’s image, the limitations to this approach are becoming increasingly apparent.
From the struggle to formally correct persistent misinformation to the failure to ensure updates and changes reliably reach its entire customer base, to the underutilized potential of Tesla’s amazing influencer crowd, and the growing challenges of navigating a growingly negative public perception, reinstating a professional PR function wouldn’t be a step backwards.
Instead, it would provide the necessary structure for consistent messaging and proactive reputation management and allow Tesla’s leadership to focus on what they do best - electrifying the world, not responding to posts on social media.
In today’s environment, it’s pretty clear — it’s time for Tesla to bring back PR.
![Tesla’s Missing Voice: Why a PR Team Matters More Than Ever [Opinion]](https://www.notateslaapp.com/img/containers/article_images/multiple-models/group_93.jpg/4e1056961f0480c7b9eff43dd2ec288e/group_93.jpg)
