Tesla has made a software-related change to the Cybertruck’s wiper to improve tackling the buildup of salt and road grime on the windshield. If you’ve driven the Cybertruck in regions that salt their roads, you’ve likely experienced this firsthand. The image above shows the author’s truck after 90 minutes of highway driving.
This issue arises because the Cybertruck’s powerful single wiper doesn’t always spray enough windshield wiper fluid to break down all the salt kicked up by other vehicles. At highway speeds, salt accumulates rapidly, and it’s even possible for the Cybertruck’s forward camera cluster to get blocked, which may trigger a request for the driver to take over.
More Fluid
The solution to this issue is simple: apply more fluid to the windshield to help break up the salt, which the Giga wiper can then wipe away. Currently, washer fluid is only sprayed during downstrokes, and holding down the wiper button just repeats the cycle. However, according to a post on X by Wes Morril, Cybertruck’s Lead Engineer, that’s about to change.
With the upcoming software update 2025.2.8, which is expected to roll out to Cybertruck owners in the next few days, Tesla has introduced a new feature for the washer button. Now, holding down the button for two full cycles (two sweeps of the wiper) will continuously soak the windshield. This means you’ll be able to apply double the amount of fluid — on upward and downward wiper strokes.
This is a highly requested improvement, particularly from Cybertruck owners in regions where road salt is frequently used during winter. While the winter season is nearing its end in much of North America, this update will be a welcomed improvement for next year’s colder months.
Thanks for the feedback - If you hold the wash button through 2 cycles the wiper will now continuously soak your windshield, effectively doubling the amount of fluid dispensed. This helps with the stubborn road salt when needed and maintains the quick cleaning functionality for… https://t.co/wEqs9uLpBB
After just recently confirming that Robotaxi and Cybercab are on track to deploy to Austin, Texas in June, Tesla has submitted an application to provide robotaxi services in California.
Bloomberg reports that the application was made late last year for a “transportation charger-party carrier permit” with the California Public Utilities Commission. That permit specifically allows Tesla to own and control a fleet of vehicles.
Robotaxi Fleet… But Supervised?
Interestingly, it was also confirmed by California’s Department of Motor Vehicles that Tesla has not made an application for driverless testing or deployment yet. Instead - they have a permit to operate and test autonomous vehicles with safety drivers. Tesla confirmed at their We, Robot autonomy event that they were testing robotaxies with safety drivers in Los Angeles already - so this isn’t a surprise.
The application with the Public Utilities Commission also details driver license requirements and drug testing protocols - which suggests that Tesla is really set on introducing their ride hailing service with safety drivers to start.
This means that Tesla will have to file an application to allow Cybercabs or other Tesla vehicles in their robotaxi fleet to drive autonomously in California. Given that the Cybercab itself doesn’t have a steering wheel or pedals - it seems likely that Tesla will continue using Model Y’s for this deployment.
Why not Autonomous?
This instead seems to be a ride-hailing service that uses FSD (Supervised) rather than FSD (Unsupervised). This could be a strategy for Tesla to break into the ride-hailing market, as they intend to offer these rides in California for free.
Offering free rides with FSD (Supervised) is a great way to introduce people to self driving. People are naturally cautious, and sometimes even afraid of autonomy - especially when they’re coming from ICE vehicles which likely had basic cruise control as their only form of driver assistance.
This also allows Tesla an opportunity to test the deployment and user experience of their ride hailing service from front to back. That means from the initial tap in the Tesla App to summon your ride, loading up and stepping in, and arriving at your destination and getting out. And what better way to receive detailed feedback on the entire process than with a human in the front seat?
This seems to just be an initial step for Tesla - who has said they intend to roll out Robotaxi services with extreme caution. They need to be confident that the potential of injury or an accident is extremely low before they allow fully autonomous vehicles out and about in public.
The standard for safety with autonomous vehicles is extremely high. A single incident - even a minor one - will get worldwide headlines. Tesla will need to achieve and demonstrate a safety level far and above the average human driver before people start to accept being moved around in autonomous vehicles.
All in all, this is exciting. While it isn’t the fully autonomous Cybercabs that will soon be prowling the streets of Austin, it is still a demonstration of Tesla’s autonomy and their path forward in regions which are a bit more restrictive in how much autonomy they allow.
MotorTrend is running their suite of Best Tech of 2025 - and the winner that took home the Best Tech for Public Charging System is none other than Tesla’s North American Charging Standard - better known as NACS or the Tesla Plug.
What is NACS?
NACS is Tesla’s home-grown connector standard - and is now the standard in North America. Tesla opened the connector standard back in November 2022, inviting other automakers to collaborate on a better and easier-to-use charging standard.
At that time, CCS was rapidly gaining traction as the industry standard, but Teslas remained the most common EV on the road. This put Tesla in a unique position to establish a new standard in North America, where the Tesla connector was the most popular.
SAE Standard
After Tesla opened up its connector, the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) swiftly adopted it, naming it the J3400 EV Coupler. The SAE initiated the process in June 2023, with the validation phase concluding in October, alongside the release of the J3400 Recommended Practices document, officially establishing NACS as the industry standard in North America.
While a few holdouts, such as Volkswagen and Stellantis, initially hesitated to embrace NACS, they soon came on board. Today, no major automaker selling vehicles in North America plans to use CCS for their future EVs.
Why is NACS Better?
NACS is an innovative charging standard that outperforms both CCS1 and CCS2 (the EU’s version) in almost every way. The system is lighter, more user-friendly, and more versatile, offering better thermal efficiency than comparable CCS systems. Additionally, the handle and plug are designed to be more ergonomic and streamlined, making them easier to use and far less cumbersome.
Differences Between CCS1 and CCS2
The CCS1 charging standard in North America combines the J1772 connector for AC charging with separate pins for DC fast charging. However, it differs drastically from CCS2, which is used in Europe. CCS2 features a more compact design and allows digital communication for both AC and DC charging. It also supports higher power than CCS1.
Technically Better
NACS was designed out of necessity back in 2012 when there wasn’t a connector that met Tesla’s needs for the original Model S. As it turns out, it remains far superior to the charging standards created by legacy automakers today, who were more concerned with having a simple plug-in port than the efficiency and quality of the charging process itself.
Unlike CCS1 or J1772, which use analog communication when charging over AC power, NACS relies on digital communication, regardless of whether it’s charging the vehicle over AC or DC power. This enables better and more reliable information exchange during the charging process. In contrast, analog systems like CCS1 can run into issues—such as ground faults—that may leave your EV bricked without an explanation since data isn’t transmitted the same way.
With NACS, however, any issues can be diagnosed on either the vehicle side or the Supercharger side. If you’re interested - open up Service Mode while plugged into your Wall or Mobile Connector, or while at a Supercharger - and take a peek at the Charging Pane.
Ultimately, NACS offers improved diagnostics and testing, a more intuitive cable and interface, and the best part is that it can support up to 1,000V charging without major changes. Plus, it works seamlessly with both residential two-phase and commercial three-phase power without requiring major alterations to the connector format—unlike CCS1 and CCS2, which uses separate connectors for AC and DC charging.
Improved Communications
We’ve already discussed how digital communication enables effective debugging, but it also plays a crucial role in streamlining the payment process for charging. This is how Tesla makes its Supercharging experience so effortless. When you plug in your vehicle, it communicates directly with the Supercharger and Tesla’s servers. Your payment is automatically processed through the payment method linked to your Tesla profile, making the entire process seamless.
In contrast, with most CCS1 chargers, the process is the reverse. While Plug-and-Charge is a standard, it’s not always fully or reliably implemented. When you arrive at a CCS1 charger, you often need to plug in your EV, fumble with an app or the screen and hope the charging post is working properly before you can proceed.
Here’s a list of automakers that have either pledged to begin using NACS - usually by their 2025 or 2026 model year - or have already incorporated it. Many of these companies also offer adapters, and can also use Tesla’s Magic Dock-equipped Superchargers.
Any companies in parentheses represent a sub-brand of the parent company that has also committed to the NACS connector.
And that’s it—NACS has won the EV charging standards race in North America. If you’re in Europe, you’re using the CCS2 connector, which is superior to the CCS1 connector offered in North America. China has its own relatively novel connector standard, but it still differentiates between DC and AC plugs, unlike NACS, which keeps things simpler.
![Tesla Launches FSD in China: First Look [Video]](https://www.notateslaapp.com/img/containers/article_images/fsd-beta/china/6cf4975c-22ff-4722-9d07-314a6bd67072_1_201_a.jpeg/29909b90cf00c415243e156becfc2992/6cf4975c-22ff-4722-9d07-314a6bd67072_1_201_a.jpg)
![Will Tesla's Unsupervised FSD Require a Front Bumper Camera? [Opinion]](https://www.notateslaapp.com/img/containers/article_images/model-y-2025/model-y-front-bumper-camera.webp/dfcea62aaa60b357e8a95c229135289e/model-y-front-bumper-camera.jpg)
