After several years of allowing third-party developers and tinkerers free access to the Tesla API, Tesla has finally announced a pricing for their API. Back in 2023, Tesla introduced their new API system, along with them being “temporarily free.”
Back then, Tesla announced their Discovery tier, which had some limitations but set the groundwork for what was to come. For the first time, developers had official documentation and support, but pricing still was to be determined.
Tesla recently announced pricing for its APIs, which, unfortunately, is much higher than many were expecting. We’ll start by reviewing everything that’s been announced and then explore what could happen for both home users and larger third-party apps.
Fleet API - Usage Based Pricing
Tesla is implementing a pay-per-use pricing model that charges users based on overall usage. Some items, such as Streaming Signals and Commands, are at a lower cost, which helps to incentivize developers to be smart with the data they’re pulling from vehicles. Meanwhile, vehicle data via REST APIs and waking up vehicles is much more expensive.
Here’s the pricing chart:
Data Type
Signals/Requests
Cost
Streaming Signals
150,000
$1
Commands
1,000
$1
Data
500
$1
Wakes
50
$1
Tesla seems like they want developers to focus on what’s happening in the now - rather than being able to track a long driving session or pull charging history from the vehicle. While some things seem cheap and some seem expensive, the overall cost is still fairly high, even for limited personal use.
Additionally, the new Fleet Telemetry doesn’t offer all the data points that are available from the older vehicle data API. That means that you won’t always be able to take advantage of the cheaper “Streaming Signals” data type - but have to fall back to the data package - which is far more expensive.
Many services use REST APIs for vehicle data at about a one-minute interval, which means that each hour of driving or charging could cost about $0.12. Since the average vehicle drives for about an hour a day and charges for an hour or two, that could cost about $0.36 cents per day — per vehicle.
Looking at a month’s worth, that’s about $10/month per vehicle. While the streaming signal API is much cheaper, the total cost would vary depending on the interval and data being collected. Each signal is a piece of data, so if you’re tracking the vehicle’s speed, location, odometer, state and battery level, that’s five signals.
Fleet API - Personal Use
Tesla’s Fleet API provides each Tesla account with a $10 monthly discount - which Tesla says can cover data streaming, 100 commands, and two wakes per day for two vehicles per month. There isn’t a discount per vehicle - it's per account, so if you have more vehicles, it’s less beneficial to you. This should allow home tinkerers to create some automations and track some data without having to pay for access.
However, this is a fairly restrictive amount of signals/requests for personal use - let’s look at the author’s Home Assistant integration for a fairly simple example.
On average, with a Home Assistant tablet at home to start/stop charging, check charge states, precondition vehicles, send Google Map targets, and a few more simple commands for just two vehicles - we make, on average, about 200 requests a week per vehicle. That comes out to 1,600 requests a month and 400 wake-ups a month.
We’re also requesting data from the Data portion of the API - not the Streaming Signals portion of the API - and that’s about every five minutes while charging - so a wake isn’t needed. With 480 data requests per vehicle per month, we’re already starting to flex the basic $10. Of course, you also want to track your trip data and output that - so add in another 500-ish requests per vehicle based on the amount of driving and interval levels.
We’re looking at $8 in wake-ups, $4 for commands, $8 for data, and at least $1 in Streaming Signals. Just for two vehicles with a fairly basic set of data tracking and usage of commands, we’re already past the $10 mark.
If you’re keeping track, that’s a total of $21 per month—minus the $10 discount Tesla provides per account. At its current usage, our Home Assistant integration would require us to pay $11 for API access a month—as much as Premium Connectivity.
While switching to the streaming API is the answer here, it’ll take time for tools and services to transition to the new way of gathering data. Unfortunately, Tesla isn’t giving developers and home users a lot of time, with pricing taking effect on January 1st, 2025.
Third-Party Developers
Take all those fairly conservative numbers I’ve provided - and scale those up 3-4x. That’s how much data is requested by popular third-party apps. They’re looking at monthly costs well beyond $50 per vehicle, with current data draws. Again, they’ll need to transition to streaming APIs where possible and optimize the data they gather, but Tesla isn’t giving developers a lot of time to do so.
Third-party developers will need to find ways to optimize their workflows, potentially raise prices, and work within and around Tesla’s new strict rules on pulling data from vehicles.
Vehicle Support
Unfortunately, 2020 and older Model S and Model X vehicles don’t support the streaming API, which means that they may not be supported by most third-party services going forward.
We’re hoping Tesla takes some steps to make its API more flexible and affordable, as even simple home use can get quite expensive.
Subscribe
Subscribe to our newsletter to stay up to date on the latest Tesla news, upcoming features and software updates.
Powershare is a feature that is currently exclusive to the Cybertruck and one of the truck’s best selling points. With its massive 123kWh battery, the Cybertruck can supply power to your home when paired with a Tesla PowerShare setup. This system also includes automatic backup failover, ensuring seamless power during home outages.
Powershare Limitations
One major limitation has been that Tesla Powerwall owners couldn’t use the PowerShare feature due to software conflicts, which took a while to resolve.
However, the challenge wasn’t just software-related—Tesla also had to navigate several regulatory hurdles. A key issue was that homes with solar integrated into their backup solution couldn’t use PowerShare. This meant homeowners had to choose between powering their home with solar or their Cybertruck, rather than combining both sources.
Solar Update
Thanks to a recent update, PowerShare is now available for customers with solar in their backup circuit, allowing them to power their home with solar energy and even charge their Cybertruck during an outage—seamlessly and automatically.
Additionally, PowerShare is now enabled for customers with a backup switch, provided they are in an approved utility region.
Powerwall Update
PowerShare will be available to Powerwall owners using a Wall Connector Gen 3 or Universal Wall Connector starting in Q3 2025. While still a few months away, this is great news for Powerwall users looking to leverage the Cybertruck’s large battery as an extended backup power source for their homes.
Wall Connector Gen 3
Interestingly, Tesla has now enabled PowerShare for the Wall Connector Gen 3, a change that appears to be driven more by regulatory approvals than hardware or software limitations.
Currently, Tesla requires customers in the U.S. and Canada to use the Universal Wall Connector for PowerShare, even if they already own a Gen 3 Wall Connector. However, this policy will likely change in the coming months as the Gen 3 Wall Connector gains official support.
Author’s Note - Powershare Pricing
We’d love to see Tesla reduce the cost of PowerShare installation. The author received a quote for a home setup with two Wall Connectors in a standalone garage with its own breaker panel. Since the home already had an automatic Generac backup failover switch, much of the required electrical work was already in place.
Despite this, the final quote for installation came in just under $12,000 CAD (about $8,500 USD at the time). This covered only the installation of a Tesla Gateway, replacing a single Gen 3 Wall Connector with a Universal Connector, and some additional wiring. Even with the Foundation-Series discount of $3,500 CAD, it won’t be cheap to install.
While this update is a great step forward, Tesla needs to make PowerShare more accessible—both by expanding it to more vehicles and by lowering installation costs. It’s an incredibly useful feature that will help sell vehicles, but affordability remains an issue.
At the Cybertruck event, Tesla showed off the Cybertruck’s extended battery, an optional accessory permanently mounted to the truck’s bed. This was Tesla’s solution to keeping the truck price as low as possible while also giving owners a chance to get close to the truck’s original range of 500 miles.
The Range Extender is engineered to boost the Cybertruck's mileage substantially, increasing the truck’s total range by about 35%.
Tesla's Range Extender is a departure from traditional range-extending methods, often involving gasoline generators. Its design, occupying roughly a third of the truck bed, strikes a balance between added functionality and maintaining the truck’s cargo space. It addresses range limitations and makes the Cybertruck more suitable for towing and long-range trips.
Range / Battery Size
The Ranger Extender extends the Cybertruck total range by 120 miles (193 km). For the Cyberbeast, it’ll take the truck’s range from 320 miles up to 440, whereas for the AWD version, the range will be increased from 325 miles to 445 miles.
These are Tesla’s latest numbers, which have been reduced slightly from Tesla’s original estimates that the Ranger Extender pegged at adding 130 miles.
The Ranger Extender uses a huge 47 kWh battery pack, which explains why it takes up a significant portion of the truck’s bed. For comparison, Tesla’s Standard Range+ Model 3 has a 54 kWh pack, capable of driving about 260 miles.
Price
Though official pricing for the Range Extender has yet to be officially announced, it looks like it’ll be priced at a hefty $16,000 USD. The night the Range Extender was revealed, code was found on Tesla’s website that showed off the $16,000 price tag. However, it’s not clear whether this price was a placeholder or if the price will change before it becomes officially available.
Size & Weight
The Ranger Extender fits perfectly alongside the back of the Cybertruck’s bed. Instead of being laid evenly across the bottom of the bed, it’s nestled up against the cabin, making it easier to load items into the truck.
Elon Musk elaborated on the Range Extender's functionality: "It's an optional pack that fits in about 1/3 of the truck bed. There is still room for plenty of cargo. It's meant for very long trips or towing heavy things up mountains."
With a battery pack of 47 kWh, the Range Extender isn’t going to be something light. The Cybertruck’s “battery pack” is estimated to weigh about 600 to 650 lbs (272 kg to 294 kg), which also means that it’ll reduce the truck’s towing capacity by that much.
Installation
A few Cybertruck owners have discussed a marketing idea for the range extender would be to rent it out. Cybertruck owners could rent it for a weekend trip or an extended holiday camping. It's unlikely that Tesla will take on that business, but it is an idea for when more Cybertrucks are around and need that extra range.
Unfortunately, the Cybertruck Range extender is not something that could be easily removed or added, mostly due to its weight. Tesla has said that the Range Extender will need to be installed by Tesla Service and it’s a “permanent” install. We imagine it could also be removed at a later date, but it’s not something you could just do on your own when you don’t need it.
Unfortunately that means that owners will have to choose between additional range or cargo room. If you use the truck mostly for towing, the reduced cargo space may not be a big deal, but for other owners that use their truck for a variety of tasks, it could be a deal breaker.
—
Some Cybertruck owners have suggested renting the Range Extender for weekend trips or extended camping holidays.
However, the Cybertruck’s range extender isn’t designed for easy removal or installation, primarily due to its weight and high-voltage connections. Tesla has stated that installation must be performed by Tesla Service and is considered a “permanent” modification. While removal may be possible later, it won’t be something owners can easily swap in and out as needed.
This means Cybertruck owners will have to choose between additional range or cargo space. For those who use the truck primarily for towing, the reduced cargo capacity may not be a major issue, but for owners who use their truck for a variety of tasks, it may not be an easy decision.
Availability / Release Date
The Range Extender was initially expected to be available for pre-order customers in early 2025, but that timeline has now slipped to mid-2025. Given Tesla’s ambitious production goals this year, it wouldn’t be surprising if it gets pushed even further, possibly into 2026.
One potential reason for the delay is Tesla’s ongoing work on perfecting its dry-cathode battery process. Since the Range Extender is a low-volume product, Tesla may be prioritizing it as a testbed for dry-cathode cells before scaling them to full vehicle production. Unlike an entire truck, a battery pack like the Range Extender is easier to replace or refine if necessary.
In the meantime, Tesla is likely focused on the Cybercab and its next-generation vehicle. The Ranger Extender is expected to use the same 4680 battery cells as the Cybertruck, so Tesla will also want to ensure it has sufficient supply for vehicle production before producing the Range Extender.
![Video Reveals the Cybertruck's Unique User Interface [Video]](https://www.notateslaapp.com/images/news/2023/cybertruck-ui-1_300w.jpg)
![Tesla Adds HEPA Filter to New Model 3, Will it Get Bioweapon Defense Mode? [Update: Tesla Edits Post]](https://www.notateslaapp.com/images/news/2023/new-model-3-hepa-filter_300w.jpg)
