In the wake of the Delaware Chancery Court's landmark decision to rescind his $55.8 billion compensation package, Elon Musk did not hold back on expressing his views. Taking to X, Musk's posts resonated with a blend of frustration, defiance, and contemplation of Tesla's future.
Musk called the decision "insulting to shareholders." Furthermore, Musk's suggestion to avoid incorporation in Delaware and his query about relocating Tesla's incorporation to Texas echo his discontent and hint at a potential strategic shift.
Unfathomable Compensation and Controlled Mindset
The 201 page Delaware Court's decision, as articulated by Judge Kathaleen St. J. McCormick, delved deep into the complexities of Musk's compensation package and the process behind its approval. The judge described the package as an "unfathomable sum," highlighting its sheer magnitude and deviation from standard executive compensation practices.
Central to the court's ruling was the notion that Musk exerted undue influence over Tesla's board of directors. The court found that Musk's control over the board and his relationships with its members significantly compromised their ability to act independently. According to the ruling, this control resulted in a compensation negotiation process that lacked objectivity and transparency.
In her ruling, McCormick noted, "Musk had extensive ties with the persons tasked with negotiating on Tesla’s behalf." She pointed out the conflicts inherent in this arrangement, emphasizing the need for a more rigorous standard in such situations. "The process leading to the approval of Musk’s compensation plan was deeply flawed," she wrote, highlighting the controlled mindset of the board and its failure to recognize the conflict of interest.
Shareholder Disenfranchisement and Material Omissions
Another critical aspect of the court's decision was the inadequate information provided to shareholders during the vote on Musk's compensation. The ruling emphasized the omission of material information about potential conflicts of interest and the overall negotiation process, which were crucial for shareholders to make an informed decision.
"The record establishes that the Proxy failed to disclose the Compensation Committee members’ potential conflicts and omitted material information concerning the process," the court observed. This lack of transparency was seen as a significant factor in the decision to overturn the package, indicating that Tesla shareholders were not equipped with all the necessary information to make an informed choice.
Musk's compensation was initially perceived as a step toward a "good future for humanity," including ambitions like colonizing Mars, but the judgment stated, “Some might question whether colonizing Mars is the logical next step. But, in all events, that “get” had no relation to Tesla’s goals with the compensation plan.” The court's analysis highlighted that the package's extraordinary size was disconnected from the automaker's objectives.
Stepping back to 2017
The court's narrative begins with Musk's own words, extracted from a 2017 email, where he expressed confidence that Tesla shareholders would be "super happy" with the compensation plan. Musk believed that the package would be perceived positively, projecting an "ultra-bullish view of the future" and symbolizing his commitment to ensuring a "good future for humanity." This ambition, while laudable, was disconnected from the immediate operational goals of Tesla, according to the court.
Emails from Musk during the compensation discussions in 2017 reveal his desire for a significant increase in Tesla ownership upon reaching a $550 billion valuation. He suggested a structure that would effectively boost his ownership stake, considering future dilutions, to around 25% over a decade, underscoring his long-term vision for Tesla. It also underscores the lack of a succession plan that exists to this day.
Testimonies from key Tesla figures like Ira Ehrenpreis and Antonio Gracias provided insight into the compensation committee's approach. They emphasized a subjective sense of fairness and collaboration with Musk, rather than objective market data or arm's length negotiations. This approach was echoed by Todd Maron, Tesla's general counsel, who described the process as cooperative and collaborative, lacking a recognized conflict of interest.
Musk's Recent Compensation Discussion
Two weeks before the court's decision, Musk discussed on X his engagement with Tesla and future compensation plans. An X user expressed concerns about Musk's apparent lack of a new incentive plan since completing his 2018 compensation milestones. In response, Musk's four-word reply, "That would be nice," hinted at his openness to discussing future compensation aligned with his contributions and ambitions in AI, automation, and space exploration.
Musk later elaborated on his desire for approximately 25% voting control within Tesla, which he believes is substantial yet not overwhelming. This statement came amidst Musk's concerns over his influence in the company, especially in growing Tesla as a leader in AI and robotics. On the same day as the ruling Musk posted an update on Tesla’s robot.
Musk's suggestion of moving Tesla's incorporation to Texas, where its physical headquarters are located, has stirred discussions about the company's future corporate structure. Relating to Texas, known for its business-friendly environment, could be a strategic response to the legal and corporate challenges Tesla faces in Delaware.
Should Tesla change its state of incorporation to Texas, home of its physical headquarters?
This potential move raises questions about the implications for Tesla's governance, legal framework, and operational strategy. A shift to Texas could signal a new chapter for Tesla as it navigates through the fallout of the court's decision and reevaluates its position in the corporate landscape.
Despite focusing on voting control and compensation, Musk's vision for Tesla extends beyond financial incentives. He is keen on advancing significant developments in AI and robotics, aiming to position Tesla at the forefront of technological innovation. This aligns with his broader goals of advancing human progress through technology.
Subscribe
Subscribe to our newsletter to stay up to date on the latest Tesla news, upcoming features and software updates.
Tesla’s latest software update, version 2025.2, brings new features to Service Mode, continuing the trend of improving in-vehicle diagnostics.
Currently, this feature is only available for vehicles with AMD Ryzen infotainment systems and requires Service Mode+, which is a subscription service aimed at technicians. Intel-powered vehicles aren’t supported yet, but we expect this feature to roll out to them as well unless hardware limitations prevent it.
Thanks to Spencer for providing an image of the panel in action.
Signal Viewer Panel
While update 2025.2.6 adds four service mode improvements, including updates to brake burnishing, charge port calibration, and noise recording panel improvements. In this article, we’ll focus on the new signal viewer panel.
This new panel offers a live data feed from selectable vehicle sensors. You select the signals you’re interested in and it’ll plot the signal on a graph. In addition to allowing you to view real-time signal data, it also allows you to record them.
The signals are searchable and can be easily added or removed from the panel. You can track up to 10 sensors, and the UI allows three of them to be viewable at once.
However, this is Service Mode and it’s more than just pretty looks. You can really dig down into these charts. You can pan them left and right through time, and tapping a specific point shows the exact value of that signal. The panel also supports pinch-to-zoom, enabling you to adjust the time scale across all panels simultaneously.
This feature is exclusive to Service Mode+, which requires a subscription to Tesla’s ToolBox3 software and a connection to a computer. It’s designed to help technicians diagnose issues related to signal quality, noise in the vehicle’s electrical systems, and signal variance in components during driving.
Tesla has updated its Model Y lineup in Europe, introducing new standard configurations while discontinuing the limited-edition Launch Series. With the new variants now available, European customers will have more choices and cheaper options to pick from.
The Launch Series and some of its exclusive features will no longer be offered—except in the UK, where it remains available alongside the new lineup.
New Models Introduced
Tesla’s new Model Y lineup in Europe includes three main variants. The prices vary slightly from country to country.
Rear-Wheel Drive (RWD): Priced at €44,990, this model is the most affordable new Model Y, but it also has the shortest range and is missing a few features available on other trim levels.
Long Range Rear-Wheel Drive (LR RWD): Available for €49,990, this version is essentially the same as the RWD model, but with a larger battery. It has seen a €1,000 price increase compared to the outgoing Long Range RWD model.
Long Range All-Wheel Drive (LR AWD): At €52,990, this model has seen a price drop of €2,000, making it a better deal than the previous LR AWD Model Y. This is also the only new Model Y to come with most of the same features as the Launch Series, including additional speakers, a subwoofer, premium materials inside the cabin and improved acceleration. Acceleration boost should also become available for this model, letting it match the performance of the Launch Series.
All Model Y variants come with all the improvements that we’ve discussed about the new Model Y, including the new front and rear light bars, improved aerodynamics, ventilated seats, improved heat and sound isolation, and the 8-inch rear touchscreen. Some exclusive options, like the Midnight Cherry Red paint, appear to no longer be available. However, Tesla has already said that they’ll be introducing new paint options for the Model Y in North America.
Compare Model Y Variants
Here’s how the various Model Y variants compare to each other:
Launch Series
LR AWD
LR RWD
RWD
Range (WLTP)
353mi (568km)
364mi (568km)
387mi (622km)
311mi (500 km)
Acceleration (0 to 60 mph)
4.1s (includes Acceleration Boost)
4.8s
5.6s
5.9s
Audio
15 speakers + subwoofer
15 speakers + subwoofer
9 speakers
9 speakers
Interior
Premium materials
Premium materials
Fabric door trim
Fabric door trim
Weight
4,402 lbs (1,997 kg)
4,402 lbs (1,997 kg)
4,191 lbs (1,901 kg)
4,250 lbs (1,928 kg)
Power Consumption
15.3 kWh/62 mi (100km)
15.3 kWh/62 mi (100km)
14.2 kWh/62 mi (100km)
13.9 kWh/62 mi (100km)
Tow Hitch
Included
Optional
Optional
Optional
Supercharging Power
250 kW max
250 kW max
250 kW max
175 kW max
Charging Speed
165 mi (266 km) in 15 mins
165 mi (266 km) in 15 mins
165 mi (266 km) in 15 mins
148 mi (238 km) in 15 mins
Battery Warranty
8 years or 120k mi
8 years or 120k mi
8 years or 120k mi
8 years or 100k mi
Extras
FSD + Acceleration Boost + Puddle Lights + LS badges + Free Upgrade to Helix wheels
None
None
None
Availability
Late February
March
June
May-June
Price
€60,990
€52,990
€49,990
€44,990
Launch Series Ends
Not a Tesla App
The Launch Series, which debuted just weeks ago in Europe, has now been phased out. This limited-edition model was priced at €60,990 and included a suite of premium features comparable to a bundle deal you may find with other products. It came equipped with Full Self-Driving (FSD), Acceleration Boost, and exclusive badging on the rear liftgate, door sill plates, and puddle lights.
While the Launch Series is no longer available for new orders in most European countries, customers can still get a similar vehicle by opting for the Long Range AWD model and manually adding premium features like FSD. Acceleration Boost, which was standard in the Launch Series, is expected to become available for purchase once these vehicles are delivered or soon afterward. However, some exclusive elements, such as badging and trim details, will remain unique to the discontinued edition.
For now, the UK remains an exception, still offering the Launch Series alongside the newly introduced models.
Performance Model Still to Come
With Tesla now introducing the expected variants of the refreshed Model Y, one notable absence is the Performance model. While the Launch Series was fast due to the Acceleration Boost addon, there’s no doubt the Performance version will be in a league of its own.
What we saw Tesla do with the 2024+ Model 3 Performance variant was more than just using binned motors. The vehicle featured unique bumpers, a spoiler, an improved suspension, sport seats, Track Mode V3 and other features that made the vehicle stand out compared to the Model 3 AWD.
The Performance version of the new Model Y is expected to become available later this year, however, expect it to carry a $5-$8k premium over the AWD model.
Other Regions to Follow
As Europe phases out the Launch Series, other regions are expected to see similar changes. With the other models now revealed, owners in other regions have a better idea of whether they should buy the Launch Series or wait for the additional models to arrive.
Tesla naturally adjusts its offerings based on market demand, and if sales of the Launch Series remain strong in other parts of the world, Tesla will likely wait it out a little longer before offering the other models.