Elon Musk's Fiery Response to Delaware Court Ruling: Tesla's Future and Musk's Influence Hang in the Balance

Musk $55.8 billion compensation package rescinded

Not a Tesla App

In the wake of the Delaware Chancery Court's landmark decision to rescind his $55.8 billion compensation package, Elon Musk did not hold back on expressing his views. Taking to X, Musk's posts resonated with a blend of frustration, defiance, and contemplation of Tesla's future.

This is insulting to shareholders

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) January 31, 2024

Musk called the decision "insulting to shareholders." Furthermore, Musk's suggestion to avoid incorporation in Delaware and his query about relocating Tesla's incorporation to Texas echo his discontent and hint at a potential strategic shift.

Unfathomable Compensation and Controlled Mindset

The 201 page Delaware Court's decision, as articulated by Judge Kathaleen St. J. McCormick, delved deep into the complexities of Musk's compensation package and the process behind its approval. The judge described the package as an "unfathomable sum," highlighting its sheer magnitude and deviation from standard executive compensation practices.

Central to the court's ruling was the notion that Musk exerted undue influence over Tesla's board of directors. The court found that Musk's control over the board and his relationships with its members significantly compromised their ability to act independently. According to the ruling, this control resulted in a compensation negotiation process that lacked objectivity and transparency.

In her ruling, McCormick noted, "Musk had extensive ties with the persons tasked with negotiating on Tesla’s behalf." She pointed out the conflicts inherent in this arrangement, emphasizing the need for a more rigorous standard in such situations. "The process leading to the approval of Musk’s compensation plan was deeply flawed," she wrote, highlighting the controlled mindset of the board and its failure to recognize the conflict of interest.

Shareholder Disenfranchisement and Material Omissions

Another critical aspect of the court's decision was the inadequate information provided to shareholders during the vote on Musk's compensation. The ruling emphasized the omission of material information about potential conflicts of interest and the overall negotiation process, which were crucial for shareholders to make an informed decision.

"The record establishes that the Proxy failed to disclose the Compensation Committee members’ potential conflicts and omitted material information concerning the process," the court observed. This lack of transparency was seen as a significant factor in the decision to overturn the package, indicating that Tesla shareholders were not equipped with all the necessary information to make an informed choice.

Musk's compensation was initially perceived as a step toward a "good future for humanity," including ambitions like colonizing Mars, but the judgment stated, “Some might question whether colonizing Mars is the logical next step. But, in all events, that “get” had no relation to Tesla’s goals with the compensation plan.” The court's analysis highlighted that the package's extraordinary size was disconnected from the automaker's objectives.

Stepping back to 2017

The court's narrative begins with Musk's own words, extracted from a 2017 email, where he expressed confidence that Tesla shareholders would be "super happy" with the compensation plan. Musk believed that the package would be perceived positively, projecting an "ultra-bullish view of the future" and symbolizing his commitment to ensuring a "good future for humanity." This ambition, while laudable, was disconnected from the immediate operational goals of Tesla, according to the court.

Emails from Musk during the compensation discussions in 2017 reveal his desire for a significant increase in Tesla ownership upon reaching a $550 billion valuation. He suggested a structure that would effectively boost his ownership stake, considering future dilutions, to around 25% over a decade, underscoring his long-term vision for Tesla. It also underscores the lack of a succession plan that exists to this day.

Testimonies from key Tesla figures like Ira Ehrenpreis and Antonio Gracias provided insight into the compensation committee's approach. They emphasized a subjective sense of fairness and collaboration with Musk, rather than objective market data or arm's length negotiations. This approach was echoed by Todd Maron, Tesla's general counsel, who described the process as cooperative and collaborative, lacking a recognized conflict of interest.

Musk's Recent Compensation Discussion

Two weeks before the court's decision, Musk discussed on X his engagement with Tesla and future compensation plans. An X user expressed concerns about Musk's apparent lack of a new incentive plan since completing his 2018 compensation milestones. In response, Musk's four-word reply, "That would be nice," hinted at his openness to discussing future compensation aligned with his contributions and ambitions in AI, automation, and space exploration.

Musk later elaborated on his desire for approximately 25% voting control within Tesla, which he believes is substantial yet not overwhelming. This statement came amidst Musk's concerns over his influence in the company, especially in growing Tesla as a leader in AI and robotics. On the same day as the ruling Musk posted an update on Tesla’s robot.

Going for a walk with Optimus pic.twitter.com/6mLJCUp30F

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) January 31, 2024

Musk & Tesla's Future and Potential Move to Texas

Musk's suggestion of moving Tesla's incorporation to Texas, where its physical headquarters are located, has stirred discussions about the company's future corporate structure. Relating to Texas, known for its business-friendly environment, could be a strategic response to the legal and corporate challenges Tesla faces in Delaware.

Should Tesla change its state of incorporation to Texas, home of its physical headquarters?

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) January 31, 2024

This potential move raises questions about the implications for Tesla's governance, legal framework, and operational strategy. A shift to Texas could signal a new chapter for Tesla as it navigates through the fallout of the court's decision and reevaluates its position in the corporate landscape.

Despite focusing on voting control and compensation, Musk's vision for Tesla extends beyond financial incentives. He is keen on advancing significant developments in AI and robotics, aiming to position Tesla at the forefront of technological innovation. This aligns with his broader goals of advancing human progress through technology.

Follow

Follow

Follow

Imagining Tesla’s Robotaxi Network Charging Stations

Not a Tesla App

It was a rainy April 1st when a news-searching author went on a delve into the depths of April Fools to find fact from falsehood. And while we found a lot of fantastic jokes, we also found some good ideas.

So, with a shoutout to MarcoRP on X, whose April Fool’s Joke gave us a good run for our money for a couple of minutes, we thought to ourselves - what would a Cybercab Charging Station / Cleaning Hub really look like?

Cybercab Wireless Charging Sites

Now, before continuing, we’d like to point out that the image up top is a joke from Marco - it isn’t an accurate or real site map submission from Tesla. However, it gave us the impetus to think critically about what is required for a Robotaxi fleet, based primarily on the Cybercab, to be able to service a city.

Requirements

Tesla will likely need to charge a small fleet of Cybercabs at a single time and in a single place. That means that the site needs to be large enough to cover a major metro area while also still being compact enough to not cost too much money to build out.

In addition, we need to factor in charge times. The Cybercab is likely to launch with a battery around 50 kWh, which will result in a range of approximately 300 miles. With that much range, the average Cybercab may not need to charge more than once or at all during daytime shifts, so instead, most of the vehicles will charge overnight.

MarcoRP

Math and Charge Times

The overnight charging means that most of these vehicles could be charged slowly. When we did some back-of-the-napkin math last year, we determined that Tesla’s wireless charger will likely peak around 17 kW (for comparison, Tesla’s Wall Connector at 32 amps charges at about 7 kW). If we scale Tesla’s wireless charger down slightly to 10 kW, accounting for some energy loss and the potential size of the site, that means a Cybercab will be able to charge in about 5 hours.

Tesla’s upcoming V4 Supercharger unit can currently handle 1.5MW per cabinet, but this slower-speed charging is A/C, not DC, which means there is a step-down loss of about 3-5%. Let’s make that a comfortable 10% for any other overages, but we can estimate around 1.35MW of power. That 1.3MW will easily handle charging up to 100 Cybercabs at once - all wirelessly, using Tesla’s unique beam-forming and beam-steering technology to keep efficiency high at every single stall.

Within about 5 hours, a whole fleet of 100 Cybercabs could be charged overnight when electricity rates are cheaper and still be out in time for the morning commute.

While this is all just hypothetical, it really does make sense that Tesla will be establishing these sites that won’t require much space or a ton of energy.

Tesla recently curtained off a large section of the parking garage at Giga Texas, as well as some of their chargers on the eastern end of the facility, leading us to believe they may just be testing this at scale internally.

There’s a lot to look forward to with Tesla’s V4 Supercharger deployment coming this year and with Robotaxi launching in just a couple of months.

Follow

Follow

Follow

Tesla Announces 2025 Q1 Numbers: Lower Than Expected, but the Worst May Be Over

Not a Tesla App

Tesla released its Q1 2025 delivery and production numbers this morning, reporting 336,681 vehicles delivered and 362,615 produced—marking the company’s weakest quarter since 2022. Deliveries declined 13% year-over-year and fell well short of Wall Street estimates, which ranged from 360,000 to 370,000. Some analysts had forecast as many as 407,000 units.

Despite the shortfall, Tesla stock is actually up about 4% this morning, not only suggesting the market had already priced in weaker performance, but that this may be seen as the low point for the company. Tesla began delivering its refreshed Model Y in March, and production across all four Gigafactories was impacted by several weeks of downtime as Tesla retooled lines to accommodate the newer model. However, there’s no doubt that there is some brand impact from Elon Musk.

Comparing Numbers

Most of the deliveries—323,800 units—came from the Model 3 and Model Y lineup, while the “Other Models” category (including the Cybertruck, Model S, and Model X) accounted for 12,881 deliveries. That’s a 31% drop for Model 3/Y and a sharper 45% drop for the Other Models category compared to the previous quarter. However, comparing it to a more applicable Q1 2024, these numbers are only down about 13% for the Model 3/Y and down about 24% for the Model S/X and Cybertruck.

In terms of production, Tesla built 345,454 Model 3/Y vehicles and 17,161 from its “Other Models” line. The company attributed the production drop to the Model Y changeover but said the ramp is “going well.” This still leaves a large gap between production and delivery numbers, although they may not be as large as many had feared.

Cybertruck

One major weak point in Tesla’s numbers seems to be Cybertruck deliveries. While Tesla previously expected the Cybertruck to sell more than 250k units per year, we’re already seeing a decline in numbers. This is likely due to several factors, including the higher-than-expected price point of the truck, the unavailability of the RWD model, and the Cybertruck’s polarizing design, which may attract unwanted attention right now.

While the Cybertruck was ramping up production in 2024, making the lower numbers reasonable, the deliveries for Q1 2025 dropped drastically compared to the previous quarter. Cybertruck deliveries are estimated to be in the 5- 6k unit range for the quarter.

The good news to take away here is that the Single Motor variant of the Cybertruck appears to be nearing release. The price of the RWD version is expected to be about $60k USD before any incentives.

Q1 Earnings Call

Tesla announced their quarterly numbers this morning and posted on social media that they’ll live stream their Earnings Call on April 22nd.

This post was later edited to change “Q1 Earnings Call” to “Q1 Company Update.” It’s not clear whether there’s any significance in this change, but it could mean that Tesla has more to announce during the call.

The Company Update will occur on April 22nd at 2:30 PM PT / 5:30 PM ET. The standard Q&A session with executives and Musk is expected to follow the release of additional financial results for the quarter.

Tesla is set to launch its long-awaited Robotaxi service in June, and a cheaper, mass-market model is also planned for this year. With delivery numbers coming in soft and the refreshed Model Y just hitting the road, all eyes will be on forward-looking commentary during the update.

Follow

Follow

Follow