Tesla's Model Y receives a nearly perfect score in IIHS crash results
Tesla's Model Y has been recognized as one of the safest cars of 2023 by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), receiving the agency's Top Safety Pick+ rating for the third year. Despite the IIHS' updated, more stringent criteria this year, the Model Y's top-rated safety features and performance earned it a place among the 48 vehicles that qualified for the 2023 awards, with 28 earning a Top Safety Pick+ rating and 20 achieving a Top Safety Pick rating.
IIHS Using More Rigid Standards
IIHS President David Harkey stated that the smaller number of winners this year reflects the IIHS' goal of encouraging automakers to continue improving vehicle safety. "These models are true standouts in both crashworthiness and crash prevention," he said.
The IIHS' updated criteria include an updated side crash test involving 82% more energy than the original, a new nighttime vehicle-to-pedestrian front crash prevention test, and stricter headlight requirements. The agency added the nighttime vehicle-to-pedestrian front crash prevention test to its metrics to address the rising number of pedestrian crashes. Harkey explained, "Safer vehicles can be an important part of the solution, even though reversing the trend will also take a concerted effort from policymakers and other stakeholders."
The IIHS also announced that it would no longer include three of its previous safety evaluations in its award criteria: roof strength, head restraint, and vehicle-to-vehicle front crash prevention tests. The agency explained that the retirement of these tests reflects industry progress, making them less relevant in their current form.
Model Y Safety Superiority is not a Surprise
The latest safety accolades should not come as a surprise. The Model Y has shown real-world evidence that it is the safest vehicle on the road. For example, in late December a Model Y protected its four occupants when it went off a 250-foot cliff landing on a rocky beach. Firefighters called it a miracle that the two children and two adults only suffered minor injuries.
Tesla leaders have repeatedly stated that the company is always looking for ways to make their vehicles safer. An incredible statement given that collision statistics show that Teslas are already 2.5 times safer than non-Teslas.
Other Automakers Catching Up
Interestingly, the Tesla Model Y achieved the Top Safety Pick+ rating, making it one of the three all-electric vehicles to receive such marks this year. Other all-electric vehicles that received the Top Safety Pick+ rating from the IIHS include the Volkswagen ID.4 and the Rivian R1T. The IIHS' website shows that the Model Y received a "Good" rating on the agency's updated side-impact test and passed the IIHS' nighttime vehicle-to-pedestrian front crash prevention test with flying colors.
The IIHS' updated standards continue to push automakers to improve vehicle safety. The Tesla Model Y's continued recognition as one of the safest vehicles on the market is a testament to the automaker's commitment to safety.
Subscribe
Subscribe to our newsletter to stay up to date on the latest Tesla news, upcoming features and software updates.
Last week, Mark Ruber, an engineering YouTuber best known for his glitter bombs, released a video where he tested Tesla's Autopilot against various conditions - including the iconic ACME painted wall.
During this test, many people noted that Mark was using Autopilot rather than FSD, even though his video was titled “Can you Fool a Self-Driving Car?”. The Tesla on Autopilot went up against a vehicle equipped with Luminar’s LIDAR rig, running some sort of basic autonomy or safety software.
New Video Tests FSD
Many people were disappointed with Mark’s video and his testing methods, so several creators got to work to actually test out Tesla’s FSD.
Creator Kyle Paul over on X made a much better follow-up video, using both a HW3 Model Y as well as an AI4 Cybertruck. In a relatively unsurprising turn of events, the Cybertruck was successfully able to detect the wall, slowed down, and came to a stop. The Cybertruck was running FSD 13.2.8.
Kyle’s team did a fantastic job building the wall and testing this in a private area using FSD rather than Autopilot. On top of that - they re-tested the results several times and recorded the entire thing in and out. While Mark’s video was more for entertainment, Kyle really set out to prove what would really happen in this unlikely scenario.
Sadly, the HW3 Model Y was unable to detect the wall, and manual intervention was required in each test. While the Model Y was running FSD 12.5.4.2 rather than an FSD V12.6 build, we don’t expect this to have had a significant impact on the test - this is more of an issue with how computer vision analyzes the environment.
There are several major differences between HW3 and HW4. The first is obviously that the version that runs on AI4 is more advanced, as the hardware is capable of processing a lot more data. However, AI4 also features much higher-resolution cameras than HW3, and Tesla recently added the ability for the video feeds to be processed at full resolution on FSD V13. This could have made the difference, although it’s not entirely clear. Perhaps if HW3 gets a version of FSD V13 in the future, HW3 can be retested to see if it passes the “ACME wall” test.
Watch
Kyle’s entire video is below. It’s only 10 minutes long, so definitely give it a watch. Props to Kyle on the quick and thorough execution.
What Does This Mean for FSD?
We broke down Mark’s test - and examined all the little issues that we discovered after doing some in-depth research - you can read our analysis here.
Putting aside the issues with Mark’s testing and instead using the new results - it seems that if you were to have to fight against Wile-E-Coyote and his ACME tools with your Tesla, cartoon logic may win if you’re on an HW3 vehicle. If you’re on an AI4 vehicle, you’ll likely come to a safe stop.
Vehicle depth perception is definitely something that Tesla has been hard at work to improve - and some fairly drastic improvements came with FSD V13 that haven’t been entirely translated to FSD V12 just yet. Future versions of HW3 FSD may be able to determine that the wall is there successfully. So Kyle - if you’re reading this - don’t get rid of that wall. We’d love to see more testing in the future.
However, this entire test scenario is so out of left field… there is a good likelihood this same test would fool some human drivers as well. The most important part is that the future of autonomy will not fall for these tricks, so it's very unlikely for someone to weaponize this idea as it’d only possibly work on a small segment of vehicles.
If Wile-E-Coyote is after you, someone else may drive into the wall before your Tesla does.
Not a Tesla App
We’re not kidding, this really happened already. This isn’t a realistic scenario outside of someone trying to play an insane prank - but it’s good to know that FSD V13 is capable of dodging this.
Tesla regularly holds quarterly all-hands meetings for employees, but last night marks the first time Tesla has live-streamed the event for the public.
The meeting primarily focused on Tesla’s employees, recent achievements, and the future of Tesla. While it didn’t reveal much new information, it was interesting to see Elon Musk candidly engaging with his teams, who seem to genuinely enjoy working with him. Still, there were a few noteworthy takeaways.
As with Tesla’s Earnings Calls and other live events, we’ve put together a concise, easy-to-digest recap of everything discussed.
General Points
Work-related Injuries declined over time
Planning to expand to new markets
Cell Manufacturing
Continuing to invest in battery supply
Cheapest, lowest cost per kWh cell
The supercharger network continues to grow
Vehicle range and charging speed should match the needs of humans and their required time for breaks
![Tesla Updates Energy App in Update 2025.8.3: Adds Reset and Distance Filter [VIDEO]](https://www.notateslaapp.com/img/containers/article_images/2025/updated_energy_app.jpg/979943fb17df5ae4e9fa668b8cd61fca/updated_energy_app.jpg)
